WORTH NOTING PAGE 76
·
On the
honesty of emotion -- quote from movie, Almost Famous
The only true currency in this bankrupt world
is what you share with someone else when you’re uncool.
·
Unlazy
days of summer by Timothy
Peltason: One Week p. 7; USN&WR,
July 14 1997
The
long, languid summers of my childhood in central Illinois in the late 1950’s
and early ‘60’s really were longer and more languid than any I’ve known
since. School was out for 12 weeks then
rather than the miserly 10 doled out to public-schooled children of New England
where I live now. The New England summer
has been squeezed to pay for snow days and for an extra week off in February
when two-career families like mine – professor husband, psychologist wife, and
two heavily scheduled children – can fit in a trip to the ski slopes or Disney
World.
Fine
trips they are, but they feel like projects, and so do these compressed summers, with their cobbled-together day-care arrangements, effortfully
coordinated camp and work schedules, summer reading lists and over-organized
athletics. And shoe-horned in there,
starting this week for many Americans, comes the determined hustle of a big
vacation. Wonderful times all, but no
time off.
My
childhood summers truly were vacations, with all the vacancy, the spaciousness
of time that the word promises. Some kids went away to camp, but
not many, not me. When I left the house
in the morning, I could count on finding a pick-up baseball game, or girls to
flirt with awkwardly, or a friend headed off to go swimming, all within an easy
bike ride and an unhurried day that stretched until late summer darkness. I must have been bored sometimes. I know that I pestered my mother to take me
here and there, to the movies or a different swimming pool on the other side of
town. But each long day held pleasures
and surprises, and it was boredom and unhurriedness that made them possible. When it was time to travel, my family went
most often to see more family and find the same easy summer happening someplace
else.
A free
space. The emptiness of my childhood summers was
protected by special circumstances.
Those summers were possible only at a particular American place and
time, in a safe, small city and at a moment for the country’s economy when many
middle-class women could afford to stay at home – and few were welcomed into
the white-collar world.
Older
teachers at my elementary school, especially the ones from small farming towns,
told stories about another kind of summer, split between late spring and early
fall, when children were needed to help with the planting or the harvest. What was vacation for those turn-of-the
century farm children, or their parents?
What was it for an earlier generation still, when childhood was the
brief time before real work could begin?
Summer
was a time for labor for those rural generations, a reality of nature with far
greater significance for them than for us.
But summer vacation is a relatively recent construct, an invention of
privilege, like the weekend, which came into being only a century ago, when
Saturday workers and Sabbath observances yielded to a new hunger and a new
space for leisure. Summer is the school
year’s end and in our child-oriented society, that makes it the end of the
working year and the beginning of a free space we’ve carved out until Labor
Day.
Americans
abhor a vacuum, however, and we seem to be filling that free space fuller every
year, working so hard at summer that it has lost some of the restorative power
it had a generation back. Maybe our
children experience it differently.
Maybe summer camp is as good a place as the neighborhood to feel the day
stretching out. But maybe it’s time for
real time off, just in case those parental anxieties are infectious – which
camp to choose, which places to visit, how to cram it all in.
WORTH NOTING PAGE 77
·
On Excess from Stephen Tyler of Aerosmith, 25
Years of Rock ‘n Roll
Anything worth doing is worth overdoing.
·
On Free Will
If one has morals, they can’t be taken away
by me or anybody else.
--
burlesque queen Lili St. Cyr
·
An Amazing Conclusion as printed in Street
News
July ‘03
The sport of choice for the urban poor is BASKETBALL
The sport of choice for maintenance level employees is BOWLING
The sport of choice for front-line workers is FOOTBALL
The sport of choice for supervisors is BASEBALL
The sport of choice for middle management is TENNIS
The sport of choice for corporate officers is GOLF
AMAZING
CONCLUSION: The higher you are in the
corporate structure, the smaller your balls become.
·
From Ghost Dog: The Way of the Samurai
Matters of great importance
should be treated lightly. Matters of
small concern should be treated seriously.
·
From State of Fear by Michael
Crichton
Every scientist
has some idea of how his experiment is going to turn out. Otherwise he wouldn’t do the experiment in
the first place. He has an expectation. But expectation works in mysterious ways –
and totally unconsciously. Do you know
any of the studies of scientific bias?
All that matters is that hundreds of studies prove again and again that
expectations determine outcome. People
find what they think they’ll find.
Do you know what
we call opinion in the absence of evidence?
We call it prejudice
Do you know how
many species there are on the planet?
“No.” Neither does anybody
else. Estimates range from three million
to one hundred million. Quite a range,
wouldn’t you say? Nobody really has any
idea. “Your point being?” It’s hard to know how many species are
becoming extinct if you don’t know how many there are in the first place. How could you tell if you were robbed if you
didn’t know how much money you had in your wallet to begin with?”
Computer models
can’t prove anything, Ted. A prediction
can’t be proof – it hasn’t happened yet.
WORTH NOTING PAGE 78
From
State of Fear cont’d
In the old days …
the citizens of the West believed their nation-states were dominated by
something called the military-industrial complex. Eisenhower warned Americans against it in the
1960’s, and after two world wars Europeans knew very well what it meant in
their own countries. But the
military-industrial complex is no longer the primary driver of society. In reality, for the last fifteen years we
have been under the control of an entirely new complex, far more powerful and
far more pervasive. I call it the
politico-legal-media complex. The
PLM. And it is dedicated to promoting
fear in the population – under the guise of promoting safety. “Safety is important.” Please.
Western nations are fabulously safe.
Yet people do not feel they are, because of the PLM. And the PLM is powerful and stable, precisely
because it unites so many institutions of society. Politicians need fears to control the
population. Lawyers need dangers to
litigate, and make money. The media need
scare stories to capture an audience.
Together, these three estates are so compelling that they can go about
their business even if the scare is totally groundless. For instance, consider
silicon breast implants. You will recall
that breast implants were claimed to cause cancer and autoimmune diseases. Despite statistical evidence that this was
not true, we saw high-profile news stories, high-profile lawsuits, high-profile
political hearings. The manufacturer,
Dow-Corning was hounded out of business after paying $3.2 billion, and juries
awarded huge cash payments to plaintiffs and their lawyers. Four years later, definitive epidemiological
studies showed beyond a doubt that breast implants did not cause disease. But by then the crisis had already served its
purpose, and the PLM had moved on, a ravenous machine seeking new fears, new
terrors. I’m telling you, this
is the way modern society works – by the constant creation of fear of
fear. And there is no countervailing
force. There is no system of checks and
balance, no restraint on the perpetual promotion of fear after fear after
fear. “Because we have freedom of
speech, freedom of the press.” That is
the classic PLM answer. That’s how they
stay in business … but think. If it is
not all right to falsely shout ‘Fire!” in a crowded theater, why is it all
right to shout “Cancer!” in the pages of the New Yorker? When that statement is not true? We’ve spent more than twenty-five billion
dollars to clear up the phony power-line cancer claim. “So what you:? … we’re rich, we can afford
it. But the fact is that twenty-five
billion dollars is more than the total GDP of the poorest fifty nations of the
world combined. Half the world’s population
lives on two dollars a day. So that
twenty-five billion would be enough to support thirty-four million people for a
year. Or we could have helped all the
people dying of AIDS in Africa. Instead,
we piss it away on a fantasy published by a magazine whose readers take it very
seriously. Trust it. It is a stupendous waste of money. In another world, it would be a criminal
waste.
Similarly, in
environmental thought, it was widely accepted in 1960 that there is something
called ‘the balance of nature.’ If you
just left nature alone it would come into a self-maintaining state of balance. Lovely idea with a long pedigree. The Greeks believed it three thousand years
ago, on the basis of nothing. Just
seemed nice. However, by 1990, no
scientist believes in the balance of nature anymore. The ecologists have all given it up as simply
wrong. Untrue. A fantasy.
They speak now of dynamic equilibrium, of multiple equilibrium
states. But they now understand that
nature is never in balance. Never has been,
never will be. On the contrary, nature
is always out of balance …
WORTH NOTING PAGE 79
From
State of Fear cont’d
I should have
known. Everybody is a lawyer these
days. Extrapolating the statistical
growth of the legal profession, by the year 2035 every single person in the
United States will be a lawyer, including newborn infants. They will be born lawyers. What do
you suppose it will be like to live in such a society?”
Alston Chase: When
the search for truth is confused with political advocacy, the pursuit of
knowledge is reduced to the quest for power.
Author’s Message …
I have had an opportunity to look at a lot of data, and to consider many points
of view. I conclude:
·
We know astonishing little about every aspect of
the environment, from its past history, to its present state, to how to
conserve and protect it. In every debate,
all sides overstate the extent of existing knowledge and its degree of
certainty.
·
Before making expensive policy decisions on the
basis of climate models, I think it reasonable to require those models to
predict future temperatures accurately for a period of ten years. Twenty would be better.
·
I believe for anyone to believe in impending
resource scarcity, after two hundred years of such false alarms, is kind of
weird. I don’t know whether such a
belief today is best ascribed to ignorance of history, sclerotic dogmatism,
unhealthy love of Malthus, or simple pigheadedness, but it is evidently a hardy
perennial in human calculation.
·
There are many reasons to shift away from fossil
fuels, and we will do so in the next century without legislation, financial
incentives, carbon-conservation programs, or interminable yammering of fear
mongers. So far as I know, nobody had to
ban horse transport in the early twentieth century.
·
I suspect the people in 2100 will be much richer
than we are, consume more enery, have smaller global population, and enjoy more
wilderness than we have today. I don’t
think we have to worry about them.
·
The current near-hysterical preoccupation with
safety is at best a waste of resources and a crimp on the human spirit, and at worst
an invitation to totalitarianism. Public
education is desperately needed.
·
I believe people are well intentioned. But I have great respect for the corrosive
influence of bias, systematic distortions of thought, the power of
rationalization, the guises of self-interest, and the inevitability of
unintended consequences.
·
I have more respect for people who change their
views after acquiring new information than for those who cling to views they
held thirty years ago. The world
changes. Ideologues and zealots don’t.
WORTH NOTING PAGE 80
From
State of Fear cont’d
·
We need a new environmental movement, with new
goals and new organizations. We need
more people working in the field, in the actual environment, and fewer people
behind computer screens. We need more
scientists and many fewer lawyers.
·
We cannot hope to manage a complex system such as
the environment through litigation. We
can only change its state temporarily – usually by preventing something – with
eventual results that we cannot predict and ultimately cannot control.
·
I am certain there is too much certainty in the
world.
·
I personally experience a profound pleasure being
in nature. My happiest days each year
are those I spend in the wilderness. I
wish natural environments to be preserved for future generations. I am not satisfied they will be preserved in
sufficient quantities, or with sufficient skill. I conclude that the “exploiters of the
environment” include environmental organizations, government organizations, and
big business. All have equally dismal
track records.
·
Everybody has an agenda. Except me.
·
On solitude from William H.
Macy movie
I
like people. I like them best when
they’re not around.
·
On Life from Laurie Anderson
Life
itself is just bad art.
·
On newspapers, George Bernard
Shaw once wrote that the problem with newspapers is that they often seem
“unable to distinguish between a bicycle accident and the collapse of
civilization.”
·
On Press Freedoms by Collin Levey
in NY Post 2/17/05 [related to “outing” of CIA agent Valerie Plame involving
reporters from NY Times and Time]
Lets all just take
a deep breath. The press doesn’t have a
“right” to know anything it wants, or have access to whomever it wants. The power and freedom of the press is that it
has the right to publish whatever it wants.
·
Training Motto – Danielle
Carruthers, Hurdler
The body remembers effort.
No comments:
Post a Comment